Current:Home > ScamsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -MacroWatch
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-18 08:44:25
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (54316)
Related
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- How to protect yourself from poor air quality
- Tom Hanks Getting His Honorary Harvard Degree Is Sweeter Than a Box of Chocolates
- Judge: Trump Admin. Must Consider Climate Change in Major Drilling and Mining Lease Plan
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- Taylor Swift Seemingly Shares What Led to Joe Alwyn Breakup in New Song “You’re Losing Me”
- Picking the 'right' sunscreen isn't as important as avoiding these 6 mistakes
- This week on Sunday Morning (June 25)
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Vanderpump Rules' Tom Sandoval Doesn’t Want to Hear the Criticism—About His White Nail Polish
Ranking
- Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
- Emma Stone’s New Curtain Bangs Have Earned Her an Easy A
- Ray Liotta's Fiancée Jacy Nittolo Details Heavy Year of Pain On First Anniversary of His Death
- Financial Industry Faces Daunting Transformation for Climate Deal to Succeed
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- In Australia’s Burning Forests, Signs We’ve Passed a Global Warming Tipping Point
- One year after Roe v. Wade's reversal, warnings about abortion become reality
- Senate 2020: In Maine, Collins’ Loyalty to Trump Has Dissolved Climate Activists’ Support
Recommendation
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
Biden hosts India's Modi for state visit, navigating critical relationship amid human rights concerns
Obama’s Oil Tax: A Conversation Starter About Climate and Transportation, but a Non-Starter in Congress
Pfizer warns of a looming penicillin supply shortage
The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
Billions of Acres of Cropland Lie Within a New Frontier. So Do 100 Years of Carbon Emissions
Bad Bunny's Sexy See-Through Look Will Drive You Wild
It's time to have the 'Fat Talk' with our kids — and ourselves